Skip to main content

Left and Right

 Scrolling through Instagram, I was seeing clips of a debate where one guy was openly declaring himself a fascist and laughing out loud; another guy was not answering a straight question of whether or not Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian children in the head was the fault of Israel. Instead, he tried to justify that those children may not be innocent. Seriously!! They were CHILDREN, for goodness' sake!!! Then there's another guy saying, White people are Native Americans. 🙄

These are actually clips from a YouTube debate titled "1 Progressive vs 20 Far-Right Conservatives (ft. Mehdi Hasan). Of course, I watched the entire thing straight.

I have to say Mehdi Hasan is excellent at what he does. So satisfying to watch. I felt bad when the guy with the pink shirt and white cap told him, "Get the hell out." I am not surprised, though. I know these people exist. Racist, fascist, privileged white supremacists who do not accept that people of color can be Americans and who spew hateful comments without regard for the feelings of other people. These people expose themselves, and it is not looking good for them in the comments section. Good job! I guess.

I have never much concerned myself with politics. I didn't even know what left-wing and right-wing politics meant. Hadn't really put thought into that kind of stuff. I asked my mom, and then we had a little chat. 

As per Google: In the context of politics, "left" and "right" represent broad ideological orientations. Generally, the left emphasizes social equality, progress, and government intervention, often associated with liberalism and progressivism. Conversely, the right tends to prioritize tradition, individual liberty, and limited government intervention, often associated with conservatism. These terms originated during the French Revolution, where seating arrangements in the National Assembly reflected these opposing viewpoints.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Left-wing:
  • Key values: Equality, social justice, progress, reform, internationalism.
  • Policies: Support for social welfare programs, environmental regulations, LGBTQ+ rights, and progressive taxation.
  • Historical roots: Emerged from Enlightenment ideals, advocating for democratic reforms and challenging traditional hierarchies.
  • Examples: Socialist, communist, and some liberal parties. 
Right-wing:
  • Key values: Individual liberty, tradition, order, authority, nationalism.
  • Policies: Support for free markets, lower taxes, strong national defense, and traditional social values.
  • Historical roots: Often associated with defending established institutions and social hierarchies.
  • Examples: Conservative, nationalist, and some libertarian parties.
Important Considerations:
  • The left-right spectrum is a simplification of complex political ideologies, and specific policies and beliefs can vary widely within each wing.
  • The meaning of "left" and "right" can also shift over time and vary across different countries and cultures.
  • It's important to consider specific policies and stances rather than relying solely on labels when evaluating political positions.
 
Okay, now I know, and I think I will remember. And you know what! I am very interested in debates now. Later in the evening today, after Sister came back from work, as we were having dinner, I was watching some debate on TV, and Sister said, "All American stuff; watch some Manipuri also." 

Talking about Manipur, I got to know that Ratan Thiyam passed away today. He was a renowned playwright and theatre person from Manipur. What can I say? Definitely a loss for Manipur. May he rest in peace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Books I Read in June 2025— Arundhati Roy, BR Ambedkar and More

 Today is the last day of June, and I feel compelled to jot down the books I read this month to reflect on my experience and learnings. These are the books: ~The Magic Fish by Trung Le Nguyen ~My Seditious Heart by Arundhati Roy ~Annihilation of Caste by Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar ~History of Modern Manipur by Lal Dena Just four. It's okay, really. There is no compulsion to read 6/7 books every month. Reading fewer books doesn't mean I'm learning less. In fact, I learned more deeply. The books this month have been impactful in different ways. Clearly, there is a shift in my choices, and I feel this was meant to be. Meaning, I'm leaning more into nonfiction now. I guess I've always been angry and frustrated deep inside. Angry about the climate crisis, social injustice, discrimination, violence, war, exploitation, etc., etc. I was just deluding myself, living in the comforting world of fiction, escaping all these thoughts. As I read more nonfiction, I get angrier, but I k...

July 2025 Reads—Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky and More

What books have I read in July? Let's see. 1. The Indispensable Zinn, Howard Zinn 2. A Livable Future is Possible, Noam Chomsky, C.J.  Polychroniou 3. Manufacturing Consent, Edward S. Herman, Noam Chomsky 4. History of Manipur Pre-Colonial Period, Gangmumei Kamei 5. Rebel India, Henry Noel Brailsford 6. Rainbow Valley, L.M. Montgomery The Indispensable Zinn is a curated collection of Howard Zinn's most influential writings. The book highlights his lifelong commitment to social justice, anti-war activism, and grassroots democracy. It includes selections from A People's History of the United States and his speeches, essays, and personal reflections. He made a powerful case for ordinary people as agents of change in history, which is exactly the kind of thing I want to read, learn, and get inspired by. I'm very glad I picked this up. A Livable Future is Possible is a series of interviews with Noam Chomsky conducted by journalist C.J. Polychroniou (sounds like a chemical su...